Thursday, May 04, 2006

You have been kicked out!!

You have wanted it. Despite all the warnings (blog, msn, in person) you haven't done anything. Promises and promises, that's all that we got from you, but then... nothing.
The result:

BOY-SCOUT
SIMBA
TORETE
CENTOLLO

BYE, BYE FRIENDS!!

Now I'm sure that you regret and will beg to be readmited. Sorry, maybe your website is this one (it's for small penis men)

Was nice to be with you guys

The admin

3 comments:

Simba said...

KIKEEEE!!!! No m hagas eso!! Tengo un post de los condones, otro de las proporciones de sexo anal y muxas mas cosas

HAsta el antivirus me da una cuenta atras
yo soy como luis necesito estar al limite

Os exare de menos

Anonymous said...

Dear friends,

Following my recent expulsion from the blog for not writing, I have decided time has come to analyze the compromise of all the team members with the main premises of our great and magnificient institution. Accordingly, and after intense research and thinking, I propose the revision of the team membership of Lovely. This is my formal request:

Issue: Betrayal to Petakillas's premises, lack of compromise with our sacred mission, suspect of unconfessed gay behaviour

Accused: Lovely

Prosecutor: Boy Scout

Reason: High treason, deception

Extended explanation: Suspect of betrayal to the Petakillas anthem and main premise "¿Qué vamos a hacer esta noche? Follar" Suspect deception about his sexual preferences after his gay behaviour during the last weekend in Uppsala, when he co-starred some very suspectful incidents with Sylvus_Kick_The_Spanish, whose nickname speaks alone...

Sentence: wanrning and call for declaration

Full text

Boy scout -outstanding member of the Petakilla's Ethic Comittee- on behalf of the members of this comittee and the whole Petakilla's team, require:

First: That Lovely -whose team membership for life is under study- proves that he has not repetitively been committing high treason to the Petakillas premise "follar" -not being in his case constrained by an specific social status, that is, being sinlge-. By means of: providing photos, videos or explicit proofs (such as some mummy's confession) of his active heterosexual sexual life.

Second: In case that the first requirement cannot be -sadly- fulfilled, he is required to proof that he is innocent of the suspected unconfessed gay behaviour above commented, by means of having sexual relations with a woman in the course of the next 7 days, providing audiovisual material related to the action.

Otherwise, he is free to admit his -very respectable- homosexual sexual preferences (if you'll forgive the repetition), and should only be judged and punished for this misdemeanour of deception by the Ethic Comittee in an extraordinary meeting.

Eventually, if he is not capable of satisfying any of the above mentioned conditions in the course of the following 7 days, should he be strictly punished by this Comittee, in order to safeguard the fulfilment of our team premises, and assure that justice and integrity will prevail over the fatuous actions of the individuals. I would personally make sure that his sentence comprises in this case a model punishment to avoid future diversions in other Petakillas behaviours.

Stockholm, Saturday 6th May 2006

Boy Scout

PD: Every graphic and/or audiovisual material provided by the defendant will be supervised by the Ethic Comittee in an extraordinary meeting with the presence of other voluntary members, assisted by the compulsory güiscolas and gintonics, and optional popcorn.

Enrique said...

Prosecutor, we are still waiting your post.